Law Offices of Brian Turner LLC

Archive for February, 2011|Monthly archive page

Family Disputes Not Limited to Divorce

In Uncategorized on February 16, 2011 at 11:54 am

When I tell people that I am a mediator, and that part of my practice focuses on family law issues, the comments that follow are almost always related to divorce, support, and child custody issues.  However, I am quick to point out that “Family Law” covers much broader areas of concern – including such difficult situations as disputes in family owned businesses, issues surrounding estate division, and issues involving elder care. 

Elder care and estate division, while not new issues, have been garnering more coverage recently in the news and attention in the public eye.  This may be a result of our population aging, or that the baby-boom generation is now providing care for their parents who are living longer than generations before them.  Whatever the reason, issues of how to provide care for the elderly – and what effect that care provision may have on the division of assets in a parent or loved one’s estate – are giving rise to more disputes that, unfortunately for the families involved, often end up in court. 

A recent Wall Street Journal article profiled a family facing these questions.  The article by Anne Tergesen, “A Referee for Family Disputes,” (available for review on line at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704124504576118051771121770.html) uses an example from a family in California who hired a mediator to help a 60 year old woman and her three siblings divide land owned by their 90 year old mother – land that had been in their family for many years.   Polly Osborne, the family member interviewed for the article, stated, “We went from not knowing what to do to agreeing on virtually everything or compromising happily.”  Ms. Osborne went on to note that she and her siblings were incorporating the agreement reached in mediation into their own estate planning. 

An article in The Buffalo News entitled “Mending Fences, With a Mediator,” authored by Emma Sapong and Sandra G. Boodman (available for review on line at: http://www.buffalonews.com/business/moneysmart/article333623.ece) demonstrates another situation.  The article tells the story of a family fighting in court over the division of their father’s estate.  One child had provided more “hands-on” care and took possession of many of the assets after the father’s passing.  Three other siblings felt that was unfair.  As the family was feuding and incurring expenses to fight amongst themselves, they turned to a mediator.  The mediator who helped them resolve the dispute shared this, “They got to express the hurt and they were addressed effectively and they understood where the other was coming from.  And by the last session, they focused on what was really important and honored their father by working through a resolution that was respectful and accommodating for all parties.”  And, the article pointed out, the family spent less than $2,000.00 on the mediation – making the process not only productive, but also cost effective. 

The key to these stories is that these families were able, with the assistance of a mediator, to preserve their relationships, save assets, and avoid courtroom drama that would have taken both a large financial and emotional toll on the families.  Other examples of disputes where a mediator can assist a family outside of the traditional divorce spectrum include: helping family members decide how to assist the elderly with managing their financial affairs; dividing up responsibility for the provision of personal care; and even issues surrounding how health care decisions should be made.  Mediation is very often the most inexpensive and productive solution facing families struggling with disputes that could otherwise tear the family apart. 

(This post can also be found at www.theagreetoagreeblog.blogspot.com)

Collaborative Law: Will Alabama Join the Trend?

In Uncategorized on February 11, 2011 at 4:25 pm

This is a re-blog of an article about SB18 – which proposes adopting the Uniform Collaborative Law Act in Alabama – potentially giving divorcing couples another avenue to resolve their divorce. Please see www.theagreetoagreeblog.blogspot.com for the full blog post

Judge Rebukes Ken Feinberg on Neutrality Claim

In Legal News on February 3, 2011 at 12:07 pm

The Federal Judge overseeing the BP oil spill litigation has ordered the claims administrator to stop telling claimants that he is completely neutral and independent from BP.  In an Order entered yesterday, Judge Carl J. Barbier instructed that Ken Feinberg must make it clear that he is acting on behalf of BP in resolving the claims made by Gulf Coast residents and that he is fulfilling BP’s obligations under the Oil Pollution Act.  The Judge went on to note that Mr. Feinberg’s claiming complete neutrality was a direct threat to the litigation. 

Mr. Feinberg and his law firm were hired by BP to administer the claims fund established to compensate victims of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.  According the the AP (http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/regulation/2011-02-02-gulf-spill-feinberg_N.htm), his law firm was paid $850,000.00 per month by BP through January of this year, and discussions about his fees going forward are underway.  Throughout his administration of the claims fund, Mr. Feinberg has held out that he is completely independent from BP.  In reality, as Judge Barbier noted, Mr. Feinberg is serving in a “hybrid” role that is not truly independent. 

Judge Barbier went on to state, “Full disclosure and transparency can ensure that the reality of the operation of a third party will be consistent with any publicity concerning that matter.  Full disclosure can also give protection to the responsible party from possible future legal attacks on the validity of the evaluation, payment, and release of claims.” 

Lawyers quoted in an article in the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/03/us/03feinberg.html) regarding Judge Barbier’s Order indicated that Mr. Feinberg’s prior claims of neutrality could give rise to challenges to the settlements he has reached.  Further arguments and briefing on issues surrounding the claims process are expected. 

A copy of Judge Barbier’s Order can be found at http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/Barbier-Feinberg.pdf

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.