Law Offices of Brian Turner LLC

Archive for May, 2010|Monthly archive page

Facts About the Latest Occ Tax Opinion

In Uncategorized on May 25, 2010 at 9:03 am

We are issuing this statement in response to the extremely negative and incorrect information being given by members of the Jefferson County Commission regarding the recent opinion of the Alabama Supreme Court in the case of Edwards, et al., v. Jefferson County – the occupational tax lawsuit.  As class counsel, we find it important that the information presented to the public is accurate and not misleading.  It is our goal that the refund process moves forward efficiently and with as little confusion as possible. 

On May 14, 2010, the Alabama Supreme Court entered its second opinion in this case, affirming that the money currently held in escrow from collections under the old illegal occupational tax is due to be refunded to the taxpayers.  The Supreme Court made clear that the disbursement of the escrow account to the taxpayers was to move forward.  The opinion also reiterated the well established rule of Alabama law that the Alabama Legislature has the power to enact retroactive taxes.  What the opinion did not do was award the escrow account to the Jefferson County Commission, nor did it order the Jefferson County Commission to enact any new ordinances to try to collect these funds after the refund was processed.  

The Supreme Court stated that, after striking language that violated Alabama law, Act 2009-811 (the new occupational tax) would allow for a retroactive tax.  The Supreme Court did not find that ACT 2009-811 in fact enacted one or that any ordinance existed to collect one.  There are serious questions as to whether the provisions of that Act would still allow for such an ordinance, as the new occupational tax took effect on January 1 of this year and all remnants of the old occupational tax are now dead.  The validity of the new tax, and any ordinances enacted under it, is the subject of a lawsuit currently pending in the Circuit Court for Jefferson County, Alabama, in the case of Weissman v. Jefferson County.   Those questions are not part of the Edwards lawsuit. 

The Edwards lawsuit was filed on May 11, 2007.  The case was litigated heavily through the years of 2007 and 2008.  This case was taken on because the Jefferson County Commission tried to skirt a valid enactment by the Alabama Legislature and Governor that repealed the old occupational tax.  Hundreds of millions of dollars were illegally collected.  On January 12, 2009, Judge David Rains entered an Order that confirmed that we were correct – Jefferson County had been collecting an illegal tax.  Judge Rains took into consideration that ordering the County to fully pay back all the taxes illegally collected would be devastating to the County.  He crafted a very thoughtful remedy – the escrow account which now has a balance of approximately $37.8 million.  Since the entry of that Order in January of 2009, the County has fought long and hard to keep this money from being refunded to the taxpayers. There have been two full appeals on the merits of this case to the Alabama Supreme Court.  And after each of those appeals, the County has been told by the Supreme Court that this is the taxpayers’ money and that it is due to be refunded.

As a result of this lawsuit, the old occupational tax has been finally laid to rest and $37.8 million is coming back to the local economy – the Alabama Supreme Court has clearly and unequivocally said so.  This case demonstrated the mismanagement of the County, and after a special session was called by Governor Riley last summer to address the occupational tax, a new occupational tax (at a 10% lower rate and without the exclusions of the prior tax) was passed – along with a bill that required Jefferson County to hire a county manager.  In short, the County did not win the Edwards lawsuit – the taxpayers did. 

Members of the Jefferson County Commission have raised angry protest to the possibility of our being awarded an attorneys’ fee for prosecuting this case over the last three years.  The issue of the payment of our fee is currently pending before Judge Rains.  Pursuant to Alabama law, our firms submitted a request for attorneys’ fees in December.  Lawyers for Jefferson County responded and a hearing was held.  Currently, Judge Rains has the matter under consideration.  We do not know what the amount of fee will be awarded to our firms for the work we have done these last three years.  However, we do know that members of the Commission are very publicly decrying the award of any fee for our work on behalf of the working people of Jefferson County who paid the old illegal tax.

The Court has appointed an escrow agent to process the refunds, and more information will be coming from the escrow agent to employers and the public in the very near future.  We appreciate the public’s concerns regarding the refunds that the Supreme Court has affirmed.  We will stand by the taxpayers and continue to fight to make sure that those refunds are processed as quickly as possible and that the money stays in the hands of the people who it belongs to – the taxpayers of Jefferson County.

Alabama Supreme Court Affirms $38 Million Refund of Occupational Tax

In Legal News on May 14, 2010 at 2:23 pm

On May 14, 2010, the Alabama Supreme Court affirmed Judge David Rains’ order providing for refunds of illegally collected occupational taxes to Jefferson County taxpayers in the amount of $37, 796,302.06.  All six justices who heard the case concurred in the result.

The opinion clears the way for the processing of refunds to people who work in Jefferson County and paid the tax between January 12, 2009 and August 14, 2009, when the Alabama Legislature approved and Governor Riley enacted a new occupational tax for Jefferson County.

“Overall, we are pleased with this result,” said Jim McFerrin, one of the lawyers representing the taxpayers in the case. “While we still believe that other moneys were collected by the County that were subject to the trial court’s Orders, we will stand by the ruling of the Alabama Supreme Court.  The opinion is well reasoned and it is clear the Supreme Court put a great deal of thought and care into writing this opinion.”

Added Sam Hill, “We anticipate that there will be further attempts by the County to delay the payment of refunds to the taxpayers.  However, we will push as hard as we can to get the refund process moving so that $38,000,000 gets back into the hands of the taxpayers and into the local economy as quickly as possible.”

11th Circuit Rules Class Action Case to Go Forward in Alabama

In Uncategorized on May 5, 2010 at 2:35 pm

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has ruled that a proposed class action lawsuit against Oasis Legal Finance, L.L.C., may go forward in the Northern District of Alabama.  In a per curiam opinion, the Court held that Judge Robert B. Propst was correct in his “well-reasoned memorandum opinion…denying Oasis’s motion to dismiss the case for improper venue.”  Oasis had sought to have the case dismissed under a clause in its form-contracts that required actions involving these agreements to be filed in an Illinois court.  Oasis’s headquarters are in Illinois. 

The class action lawsuit, filed by the law firms of Hill | Turner, LLC, and the McFerrin Law Firm, challenges the validity of Oasis’s “non-recourse” legal funding contracts under principles of Alabama law that hold contracts involving gambling on the outcome of lawsuits invalid.  Both Judge Propst and the judicial panel of the 11th Circuit who ruled on the matter noted that the agreements provide that any disputes would be determined under Alabama law; that issues regarding the validity of the contracts are a matter of Alabama law; that the potential class members are all Alabama residents; that the class members entered into their contracts in Alabama; and that under those circumstances it was unreasonable to hold that the forum selection clause in Oasis’s contracts seeking to restrict the cases to an Illinois court was unreasonable. 

The lawsuit, styled Rucker, et al v. Oasis Legal Funding, L.L.C., will now move forward in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

Another Major Children’s Medicine Recall

In Legal News, Uncategorized on May 1, 2010 at 10:44 am

McNeil Consumer Healthcare has announced another major recall of children’s medications – including Tylenol, Motrin and Benadryl formulations.  The recall has been announced for quality control purposes and no injuries have been reported to the Food and Drug Administration involving these medications.

A full list of the recalled medications, including NDC numbers, can be found at http://www.mcneilproductrecall.com/

Parents should discontinue using any of the listed medications.

Michael C. Quillen Joins Hill | Turner, LLC

In Uncategorized on May 1, 2010 at 7:08 am

The law firm of Hill | Turner, LLC, is pleased to announce that Michael C. Quillen has joined as counsel to the firm. Mike has practiced law in Alabama since 1975, most recently with the law firm of Walston Wells & Birchall, LLP.  His extensive background, both as an accomplished trial attorney and as a mediator, brings a wealth of knowledge and experience to the clients of Hill | Turner, LLC.  In addition to having tried over 100 jury trials, Mike is an accomplished appellate attorney.  He, along with Sam Hill, was involved in the landmark Gore v. BMW case before the United States Supreme Court.  He has been instrumental in settling or obtaining summary judgments in several hundred other cases.  Mike’s experience in evaluating and settling cases led to his developing an active mediation practice.  Mike was trained by the American Academy of Attorney Mediators and the American Arbitration Association, and is frequently asked by attorneys and judges to mediate cases.  Mike is a member of the Birmingham Better Business Bureau’s panel of arbitrators, and has served as a Court Appointed Special Advocate in the Family Court of Jefferson County representing the interests of children in cases of abuse and neglect.

“I am very excited to be joining the Hill | Turner team,” said Mike.  “Sam and I have worked together in the past, and I am looking forward to that renewed relationship.  Having watched this firm take shape, I am invigorated by the opportunity to turn this new page in my career and to work with such an exceptional group of people.”

“Mike’s experience is such a good fit for our firm, particularly the business litigation clients we represent.  His vision as a mediator and his approach to case evaluation will help shape the solutions we can provide to all of our clients,” said Brian Turner.  “Mike has been an excellent mentor, not only to me, but to so many lawyers,” added Sam Hill.  “Our clients will benefit from the experience he brings to the table and the perspective he will add to the issues our clients face every day.”

For more information about the firm, please click “About Hill | Turner, LLC” below.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.